Subject:
|
Re: Sluggish nntp performance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 23:01:59 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@NOMORESPAMnovera.com
|
Viewed:
|
3426 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> [snip]
> > 4 631 ms 640 ms 451 ms 38.146.57.1
> > 5 1222 ms 921 ms 71 ms rc6.ne.us.psi.net [38.1.41.6] • [snip]
> > 3 671 ms 350 ms 341 ms 38-default-gw.psi.net [38.1.1.1]
>
> In both of these cases, you're having trouble before you even get out of
> psinet. That makes the rest of the data irrelevant....
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > [...]
> > As a point of information, I am physically located less than 30 miles
> > north of Boston where pairnetworks presumably(?) is located. But
> > physical location is less relevant than link and box speeds.
>
> Pair Networks is in Philadelphia.
Hey, I ain't a networking kind of guy so if what I posted wasn't too
much help, so be it I guess... Seemed like a good idea at the time.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sluggish nntp performance
|
| My subjective observation is that performance is definitely deteriorating.... Here are a couple of tracerts... I have blanked out the first two network addresses, my client is confidential. But with times under 10 ms they may or may not matter much. (...) (27 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
