 | | On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Todd Lehman
|
| | | Last night at IHOP, after copious amounts of beer at Rocklands, a few of us were talking about how we cut our food up into differently-sized portions during the eating process, and I realized that an algorithm exists for maximizing the total (...) (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) Get some sleep! :-) -->Bruce<-- (now I'm going to have make French Toast in the morning...) (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —David Laswell
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Todd Lehman wrote: <snip> (...) <more snip> (...) It may be sound in theory, but I think you need to recheck your math a bit... (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | On 02:13 16-08-04, Todd Lehman wrote (...) <MUCH GEEKAGE SNIPPED> (...) Me thinks someone was over thinking this a bit too much.... excellent geek analysis... Note that this algorithm doesn't apply well to liquids in bottles or (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well let's just say it was a thinking and reflecting kind of evening. --Todd (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Mark Bellis
|
| | | | | | (...) The easiest way to divide up a bottle of liquid would be to use the spirit measure, though this is not recursive: Repeat Attach measure to bottle Repeat pour drink drink Until bottle empty Seek another bottle Until too drunk to lift glass not (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | | (...) True. There's always the square equivalent where you cut into nine and remove the centre square. Sorry, back up. That's just too weird to contemplate. Cutting a slice of bread into ninths, not quarters? I mean, even the triangularists still (...) (20 years ago, 20-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Tommy Armstrong
|
| | | | | (...) I feel privaleged to be present when this important algorithm was created. But, I am not so sure that Todd's very important contribution into the consumption of food and to the further appreciation of the culinary delights is really as limited (...) (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Todd Lehman wrote: snip (...) And what makes this even more impressive is that earlier in the evening, Todd gave every impression of a man so tired he couldn't hit the ground two tries out of three (although I know a (URL) (...) (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | | (...) snipped You know, I think I may take this as proof that I am missing the GEEK gene, as I heard the discussion first hand, and now I'm reading it again..... and STILL the *ONLY* part I understand is "copious amount of liquor." On a side note, (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Heh heh, ok, lemme see if I can give it a non-geeky explanation... Instead of eating your french toast by carving out roughly equal-sized small pieces one at a time, do this: Cut the toast in half and consider each half a new piece of toast. (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hey thanks Todd, I think. To be honest I just found the whole thing so funny because I can honestly say, none of my non-Afol friends can manage to spell "recursively" after a night of drinking never mind have a working theory around it based (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) You play with LEGO bricks. You openly admit it. You even joined an online community to bask in the brickiness of it all. You've got the Geek gene. Now, your gene might be smaller and more selective than those of others here, but it still (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | (...) Recursively speaking. I saved this reply so I could enjoy it all over again. See, by ignoring this post, thus savoring the experience, I held off in replying so I could cherish the moment. Until I was ready to pop-stack. THEN, I look over and (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
