Subject:
|
Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:15:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1102 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Mark Bellis wrote:
> ...
> If you use triangular toast and cut into four triangles,
> omitting the middle one from the next round of cutting,
> you might end up with something similar to
> Sierpinsky's gasket, quite a pretty fractal!
>
> Mark
True. There's always the square equivalent where you cut into nine and remove
the centre square.
Sorry, back up. That's just too weird to contemplate. Cutting a slice of bread
into ninths, not quarters? I mean, even the triangularists still stick to twos
and fours.
Anyway, the bigger question, surely, is does it work as well with 'freedom
toast'? :)
Or do you just keep hacking away at that randomly until there's nothing left...
;->
Jason Railton
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
