Subject:
|
Re: Here's looking at Euclid
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:09:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
285 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, David Eaton writes:
>
> > > I have the coordinates of the points, so am I correct in thinking I can
> > > calculate X?
> >
> > Nope... again, not unless you know something else (like how many verticies
> > there are in between the two points).
>
> D'oh! I should have specified that the two points are vertices of a single
> side of the octagon; I'm sure of that much!
>
> Am I on the right track here? Assuming that the side of the inscribed
> octagon is 10 units long, I'm calculating the circumference to be about
> 82.06. Close?
>
> Dave!
I'd say so :) Knowing that they're two verticies side by side helps! By my
calculations I get:
if length of a single side of the inscribed octagon is 10:
Radius of the circle: 13.06562964876
Diameter of the circle: 26.13125929753
Circumference of the circle: 82.09377223816
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Here's looking at Euclid
|
| (...) D'oh! I should have specified that the two points are vertices of a single side of the octagon; I'm sure of that much! Am I on the right track here? Assuming that the side of the inscribed octagon is 10 units long, I'm calculating the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
