To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 1907
1906  |  1908
Subject: 
Re: Here's looking at Euclid
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:06:51 GMT
Viewed: 
1560 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, David Eaton writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dave Schuler writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.geek, John Gramley writes:
> > > 
> > > **snip of some rather helpful stuff**
> > > 
> > > How about this:
> > > 
> > > Suppose the two points are vertices of an inscribed octagon whose sides are
> > > each of length X.  Would that help?
> > > 
> > >     Dave!
> > 
> > Well... yes, I guess... assuming you knew X, though, you could easily
> > calculate the diameter of the circle even without knowing the distance apart
> > the two points were... Then the diameter of the circle would simply be:
> > sqrt((((2X)/sqrt(2))+X)^2+X^2)
> > 
> > But if you don't know how long X is, no help (sorry)
> 
>  I have the coordinates of the points, so am I correct in thinking I can
> calculate X?

Nope... again, not unless you know something else (like how many verticies
there are in between the two points). You could probably come up with a good
guestimate, though, since there would only be 4 possible values for X, all of
which you could calculate (there could be either 0,1,2,or 3 verticies of the
inscribed octagon in between the two points). Then you could concievably find
the answer that appears to match most closely-- but that assumes you have can
even make a good guess...

DaveE



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Here's looking at Euclid
 
(...) D'oh! I should have specified that the two points are vertices of a single side of the octagon; I'm sure of that much! Am I on the right track here? Assuming that the side of the inscribed octagon is 10 units long, I'm calculating the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Here's looking at Euclid
 
(...) I have the coordinates of the points, so am I correct in thinking I can calculate X? In any case, thanks to everyone for the help; I have what I need to figure it out! Dave! (26 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

19 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR