Subject:
|
Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 May 2000 15:35:08 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.antispamORG
|
Viewed:
|
193 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote:
> I think SCSI on just about any machine you might use for most things in a
> personal way is a waste. At least it isn't a ridiculously expensive waste
Specifically, people code or do graphics work -- for personal stuff, even --
and really _can_ benefit from scsi.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
| (...) Can benefit some, yes. And I guess at that point those people need to make a cost-benefit analysis as to whether they think it is worth it to shell out the still large amount of money to go SCSI. And if they think it is really worth it, great. (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
| (...) Maybe if you're gaming on a crappy machine. I love these "SCSI vs IDE" talks. I own and use systems with both. The _only_ times I notice the differences are when I'm copying gigantic amounts of data from one drive to another. And I mean (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
