 | | Re: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows
|
|
A small typo slipped in... must have been cosmic rays, as I never make misteaks, just ask me. (...) this should read (...) Sorry about that. As of this post all the posters to this thread are against fixed size. But that is an totally unscientific (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | RE: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows
|
|
(...) I *do* find it annoying when one tries to fit a legal size sheet of paper in a letter size folder, but that's beside the point. (...) I like to browse with the window maximized (at 1152x864 res) because it blocks out whatever other noise lurks (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows
|
|
In lugnet.general, Matthew Gerber wrote: [snipped rant] (...) I think that webpages are in a different medium than print material, and the rules of one don't necessarily apply to the other. Forcing browser-window size changes is rude. Especially (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows
|
|
(...) Not sure what you mean by that and not going to dig into it but it doesn't sound right to me. (...) I'm not taking anything personally, and I hope you aren't either. So I'm not insulted. What I am, however, is *confused* about where you are (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows
|
|
(...) The whole point of HTML is that it is not a static book or magazine, but a dynamic representation that is interpreted by the local style and preferences of the user. Much kludging has been done since the original DTD to try to allow marketing (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows
|
|
(...) See below (...) See below (...) See below (...) See below (...) See below (...) Larry, you are truly the master of attributing your words and ideas to the wants/needs/desires/...ughts/etc. of others. If you have taken anything I have written (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows
|
|
(...) You, in this case, asked for input. I gave it. Sorry that the input you asked for wasn't what you wanted to hear. But more importantly, there is value in complaining about things to the owners, even if that complaint is unsolicited. I complain (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows
|
|
(...) Ah, but no one is forcing you to view the material! You make a concious decision to partake of what is offered. (...) Here again though, I have chosen to participate, and should live with what is offered-their vision of what their site should (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Web: Design vs. Use (was Re: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows)
|
|
(...) And they ARE spiffy and thanks for sharing, let us not let that point get lost in the firestorm you are about to reap... (...) Yes, indeed, your perogative. And when you have something valuable to give away, you have a bit more leeway than (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Web: Design vs. Use (was Re: LEGO Inspired Fonts For Macintosh And Windows)
|
|
(...) If that were the case, there would still be nothing but monospaced text on the Internet. Why Java, Shockwave, Flash, DHTML, etc., but to give the designer even MORE tools to put forth the message/image/etc. that they desire? Just like any (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
