 | | Re: Desktops with SCSI drives (was Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?)
|
|
(...) RAM (...) Dell sells them... Are you having a hard time finding it on dell.com? Dan (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI drives (was Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?)
|
|
(...) As most of you guessed, I meant a SCSI hard drive, not RAM. It's just that RAM has been on my mind ;) Thanks for the SCSI v. IDE argument...Although I do graphics stuff, I'll probably end up going with the IDE anyway, unless someone knows (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) Don't worry - many more important things we can blame on Bill. :) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) Can benefit some, yes. And I guess at that point those people need to make a cost-benefit analysis as to whether they think it is worth it to shell out the still large amount of money to go SCSI. And if they think it is really worth it, great. (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) Ok, I'll be a little clearer. For the vast majority of people, and that's including ME, and I own more computers that I use for more purposes than probably 99% of the computer owning population - everything from gaming to web serving to mp3 (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) :) Yeah, but I don't think it's fair to blame that one on Bill. The 640 thing was designed into the hardware by IBM. (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) Specifically, people code or do graphics work -- for personal stuff, even -- and really _can_ benefit from scsi. (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) well, isn't there a famous quote of Bill Gates that "no one will ever need more than 640K of RAM"? :) Dan (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) Probably true for gamers, and certainly for someone who just wants to browse the web / do office stuff. People just shouldn't say that IDE performs as well as SCSI without some serious clarification. It reminds me of a computer expert friend (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) Maybe if you're gaming on a crappy machine. I love these "SCSI vs IDE" talks. I own and use systems with both. The _only_ times I notice the differences are when I'm copying gigantic amounts of data from one drive to another. And I mean (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) Yes indeed. Also bad for anything both cpu and disk intensive, like compiling or certain graphics stuff. (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
This is a result of the Number One difference between IDE/UDMA and SCSI; IDE 'borrows' number-crunching from the system processor (thus affecting processor load and responsiveness), whereas SCSI has all the number-crunching built into the controller (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
Quantum still makes these, and calls them Solid State Disks. They have a bad size/capacity ratio, but phenomenal access times and reads-per-second rates. (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Desktops with SCSI RAM?
|
|
(...) of In the olden days before processors could address massive amounts of RAM, you could get cards and external peripherals that contained dynamic volatile RAM on a SCSI interface that would behave like very fast disk. It was used for video (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad Choices
|
|
(...) That would be Shugart (...) Actually it was spelled SASI and pronounced "sassy". It later became a non-company specified standard and was renamed SCSI. (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad Choices
|
|
When they first came up with SCSI, the originators of the standard (no, I don't remember who it was) tried to impress upon everyone else that SCSI should be pronounced "sexy"... it was the geeks (snorting derisively at a too- cute acronym, no doubt) (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad Choices
|
|
(...) Hunh? Oh wait, you said Apple/Mac groupies, so I get it now. Its scuzzy - deal with it. :) I'm sure Apple/Mac groupies could put their collective efforts into something more useful, like maybe encouraging Apple to come up with cooler new (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Programming & LEGO legal stuff
|
|
PASCAL is a pretty nice language to learn how to program, that is how I first really learned to program (ignoring BASIC hacking). The game part can be done, About 10 years ago, my term project in a pascal class was to write a Wheel of Fortune game (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad Choices
|
|
(...) Small Computer. It's just a carryover of the hard c (k) sound: skuzzy rather than suzy. I use "scummy" and "scurvy" and the people at work always know I'm refering to SCSI. Nothing like mking a bad choice worse. ;-) Bruce (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad Choices
|
|
(...) To look at them, most geeks do think scuzzy=sexy. eric (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
