 | | Re: Outlook Express 5.0 Time?
|
|
Matthew, (...) Anyway, (...) marks? It does not appear so, according to what I have seen. Scott S. -- Scott E. Sanburn Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Soon: The Sanburn Systems Company (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: GUI LUGNET streaming news client in Java (Was: Pseudo-streaming live news (was: Re: Monitor Page))
|
|
(...) Nope, that would put sensitive data into the httpd logs! Gonna hafta pass your cookie the regular way, not part of GET. In addition to your cookie, here's what you wanna send via HTTP POST to /news/rate.cgi, basically: (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek) !
|
| |
| | Re: GUI LUGNET streaming news client in Java (Was: Pseudo-streaming live news (was: Re: Monitor Page))
|
|
(...) The ratings are actually meta-data separate from the actual messages. (The message headers and bodies are constant but the ratings change over time.) What I need to figure out before serving a rating stream is how efficiently updates could be (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Outlook Express 5.0 Time?
|
|
(...) Does it generate clean outgoing mail, or does it do nasty things to " marks? (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
|
(...) Yet for things like Quotes 'R' Us, it makes a lot of sense. Why reload the entire page when all you want is a new quote? (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek) !
|
| |
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
|
(...) Less shamelessly now, btw -- the page maintainer has made a more obvious credit to Q'R'U, and I'm okay with that if he is. (See: (URL)). (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
|
(...) Assuming they didn't ask your permission first, I'd say grabbing your quotes is kinda rude. Except for the existence of your uncopyright page, which pretty much allows anyone to do what they want. But still, professional sites should have (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
|
Dan: (...) If they make the pages with links to the rest of the site, then that shouldn't be the least bit difficult. And I can't see how a "cover page" can generate more revenue than a page inside the site. (...) If you use Pause DB images alone, (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
|
(...) while true - at least then they get to generate revenue, or attract to the rest of the site. If you use pause DB pics in your ebay auction (for instance), you are abuseing the fact that the pics are up there. (...) people should read what you (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
|
Dan: (...) The HTML construct with the FRAMESET and FRAME elements is a serious mistake that Netscape forced unto W3C even though it doesn't fit with the design of the web. (...) I don't feel the least bit bad about using peoples bandwidth, and I (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
