Subject:
|
Re: Hate the current boxes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 01:04:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
366 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 19:45:40 GMT, Beth Reiten <breiten@net-art.de>
wrote:
> As a general "life note to the wise": If they don't specifically TELL you that the
> item in question is acid-free/archival quality/whatever, IT ISN'T. And you would
> notice a price difference; i.e. the cheap card sheets as opposed to the UltraPRO ones.
Ultra-Pro is best for sheets, but not quite so hot on sleeves, IMO.
The cheap (for 100, 1/4 the price of a pack of Ultra-Pro's) sleeves,
totally acid free, designed originally for storing Baseball cards (how
many of you have a Mint condition Joe DiMaggio?), are better. They are
_especially_ better if you're just displaying and not playing.
Ack.. to off.topic with this.
Jasper "No, i never played M:tG, whyever would you say that?" Janssen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Hate the current boxes
|
| You weren't supposed to notice that M:tG was why I knew this!!! Now I'm going to have to kill you... my geek is showing! (Actually, I'm a librarian... we know about archival quality) Beth Reiten (...) (25 years ago, 11-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hate the current boxes
|
| (...) the (...) hey, this is one of those "why didn't i think of that" ideas. EXCELLENT, gary! thanks a lot for this inspired idea that is going to save me from a lot of stress (and incidentally save a lot of bricks that could have gone missing). (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
