 | | Re: Just reach for Lugnet
|
|
(...) Bed????? Hmmmmmm... Maybe that's why he moved on from stress balls to hotels. Janey "Red Brick" (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Just reach for Lugnet
|
|
(...) You need to regain your Lugnet, Eric, and go to bed. It's way past your bedtime. -Teddy (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) When the Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Council of Bishops were deciding who to make the next Supreme Intergalactic UItimate LEGO Pope, the choice was obvious. There was only one person Supreme enough. There was only one person (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) Hey, who died and made you Pope? ++Lar (who has been known to hang with watery tarts, hoping for the best) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) nuqDaq yuch Dapol! -Jason (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | I need a big favor
|
|
I work with a guy whose last name is Hunter. For some reason he recently started a facetious campaign calling for his own demise. Specifically, he's been signing emails with a "Death to Hunter" byline, and he's encouraged us to do the same. We've (...) (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Nick Deluxe
|
|
So I was surfing around LUGNET and I found the Set Rank database. The lowest rated set is Nick Deluxe, but the first comment in the Notes section almost made me spit hot coffee out my nose. (URL) :D -Evil Wayne (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Two Towers (was Re: Fellowship)
|
|
(...) (URL) Scotty!> Dave! (20 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) Sorry, I didn't type "failed attempt" in as I meant to. The point is that I don't agree with your assessment that they were trying to be deeply philosophical, but rather not simply frivolous. (...) 1. "Public Knowledge": The only people who (...) (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) No, I regard it as a failed attempt at a deep philosophical message. (...) I think that in this case it has more to do with how long and clumsy the title is. I've only watched a couple eps myself (not having access to Comedy Central, or (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) The OT was constructed in the Epic tradition, with archetypal characters playing archetypal roles in an archetypal battle of Good vs. Evil. There's more to be found in the way the mythological pattern plays itself out than in any supposed deep (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) Since we're talking Trek, let's talk about some of our favourite eps from TOS-- Corbomite Maneuver - was first season, which helps, and knowing that the kid is Richie Cunningham's older (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) I think it is a matter of perception. You regard it as a deep philsophical message, and perhaps that is a fair depiction of it, but I regarded it simply as a step back from trivializing it. The movie was uneven all the way through, so this was (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) One minor point that bothered me was how Ensign Slater just let himself into Capt. Sulu's quarters to wake Sulu, and how Kirk later just let himself into Spock's quarters. It all suggests a level of familiarity not customarily found on (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) I can't remember what the first two were in relation to, so pardon me if I think they were not memorable. The last was a self-parodying line that got laughs but cheapened the whole. Played to the Trekkies rather than it's own internal value. (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) I'm sorry, but for my money, 6 was 'perfect' trek--as perfect as one could get in the Star Trek universe--you have the 'moral story' that Roddenberry liked to do, like eps--'A Private Little War' and the one with (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) Well, few are the sci-fi films that successfully carry a deep philosophical message. The Star Wars OT, for instance, seemed to suggest that you can be as evil, sadistic, and murderous as you want, as long as you kill one bad guy before you (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) There was an attempt at one (that's the whole point of the way the ending played out, and the name of the movie itself), though it fell pretty flat. (...) MST3K = Mystery Science Theatre 3000. They take all of the worst movies that they can (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) The Shatner was in VII "Generations," in which he went head to head with Malcolm MacDowell for a bit of the old ultra-violence. (...) That's the one! I like them, even with their artificial drama. Maybe it's all the tubes and hoses. (...) In (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Wing Commander (Re: Monday Morning Diversion)
|
|
(...) Actually, I'm of the mind that WC is a real classic. It came out about the early 90's and it *was* a landmark. Graphics, sound, and most important: Plot. The missions you flew had a success or fail tree, so if you kept winning you drove the (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
