To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: bruce half irish
 Results 201 – 220 of about 1900.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
 
(...) that (...) your (...) 20% of the *adult* population, not just *male*. As to the breakdown between male and female, I don't know. In India, I know it is spread through prostitutes. I'm not familiar with the primary vector in Africa. (...) 20% (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.363)

  Re: Pax Americana (was Re: Where did you lot spring from?)
 
(...) Australian (...) references (...) be (...) I (...) Disneyfication (...) idea (...) entirely (...) Ummmmm, I was indicating that while the rest of the world screams about Americanization and Cultural Imperialism (Don't Buy Our Stuff if that's a (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.363)

  Re: Bill Gates' real crime...
 
(...) Investors (...) behave (...) just (...) Two wrongs make a right? And I see lots of systems at my job that have unix, not windows. (...) I really don't want to sit and enumerate all of Microsoft's trangressions. It's a big, sprawling, complex (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.362)

  Re: Bill Gates' real crime...
 
It seemed to me a pretty clear-cut case of monopolistic practices. Investors big and small should have seen this coming miles away. Microsoft even got a previous wake up call, dodged the bullet on penalties, and proceeded to behave as arrogantly as (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.362)

  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) level (...) (trust (...) Are you thrusting the fault onto me? You dip, I'll strike you. Bruce (24 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.362)

  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) Comes from being stoned all the time. But hey, I getta get my rocks off somehow. Bruce (...) drag (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.362)

  Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
 
(...) data (...) Everything I have read lately has been confirming that the world is indeed slowly warming (currently). Whether this is a natural phenomenon or not seems to be much more under debate. I'll ask my best personal source his opinions (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.362)

  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) The schist you say! Okay, no more mister gneiss guy if you are going to drag the whole U.S. Geologic Survey. But I'll bet their busy playing with their orogenous zones. Bruce (24 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.362)

  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) feet (...) That entirely depends on the geology of the local area - it could be sea level changes or it could be the land itself varying due to tectonic activity (trust a Californian to think along these lines). Bruce (24 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.362)

  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) That's why I put the "might" up there. We are in agreement. (...) That's why I said we need to search out alternatives before we are faced with such a choice. But then again, I'm sick of the Florida Hurricanes winning the NCAA title all the (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.362)

  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) Booster blows up - you now have radioactive material spread over an extremely wide area. And to make the launch somewhat econonomically feasible, you packed it to the max. Thankfully, it took off from Florida (which if we recall, is going to (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.362)

  Re: positive impeachment
 
(...) Been there, done that. Or at least the California Republicans have. Sorta. They had a one vote edge in one of the two state houses and were exultantant that they would finally replace the demonized Willy Brown as Speaker of the House with one (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.361)

  Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
 
(...) Rule Number 1: If you make something foolproof, they'll only go out and invent a better fool. :-) (Actually, until the working railgun exists, missles are the only option, and even getting teeny-tiny reactors for deep-space satellites takes an (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.361)

  Re: Where are you guys?
 
(...) Well, I'm not intending to offend, but I have been a little concerned lately with the adventures group... I posted a bit in the beginning because I do love the Adventures theme (especially the Egyptian stuff!) but lately I've just been (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.361)

  Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
 
(...) Oh my gosh! Something that returned close to the original point! :-) This is not unreasonable - put the money were it will do the most good. Lots of times my wife and I decide we want a number of things and there isn't enough money to go (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.359)

  Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
 
(...) No, the research dollars will be spent where there is the *perception* of best return. Further, it may be simply be the perception of the best short-term return. And just to add to that, it may involve more resources than a single company can (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.359)

  Re: guns vs. household cleaners vs. gamers (was Re: What do other parents do with Lego guns?)
 
(...) ingestion (...) Actually, they are trying frantically to get people to lock up dangerous chemicals and keep them away from kids, so I can't agree with this line of logic. Thinking about it more, this line of logic is: hey, people are stupid (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.354)

  Re: Hitler minifig (Adventurers)
 
(...) I take it you didn't bother to read down to where I point out my own "wacky" name. Lighten up, and kindly don't pull a quote out of context. Bruce SCHLICKBERND (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.353)

  Re: Star Wars on DVD
 
(...) 1000 (...) Just you. :-) B ruce S chlickbernd (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.353)

  Re: guns vs. household cleaners vs. gamers (was Re: What do other parents do with Lego guns?)
 
(...) much (...) The primary use of a handgun is to shoot people. If you want to go hunting, it's a poor choice. Target practice? Yes, but that's not why handguns were invented. Ruger. Good choice. Very solid. I liked my Ruger much better than (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 1.353)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR