Subject:
|
Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 May 2000 18:14:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
697 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> That's assuming we'd use boosters, of course. I figure railguns would be more
> foolproof.
Rule Number 1:
If you make something foolproof, they'll only go out and invent a better fool.
:-)
(Actually, until the working railgun exists, missles are the only option, and
even getting teeny-tiny reactors for deep-space satellites takes an act of
congress as it is)
>
> Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > > Heck yeah fission is cleaner. We always seem to be worried about what to • do
> > > with the spent rods - why not drop them into the sun? It's not like it's
> > > going to pollute the sun or anything, and the canisters wouldn't need much • of
> > > a boost at all.
> >
> > Booster blows up - you now have radioactive material spread over an • extremely
> > wide area. And to make the launch somewhat econonomically feasible, you • packed
> > it to the max. Thankfully, it took off from Florida (which if we recall, is
> > going to be flooded anyway) and not Vandenderg in California. ;-)
> >
> > Bruce
>
> --
> | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp
> | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
228 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
