To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5661
5660  |  5662
Subject: 
Re: May Day "riots" in London
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 11 May 2000 18:18:14 GMT
Viewed: 
226 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Alex Farlie writes:

Defacing a national monument (The Cenotaph) is not legitamate protest.

Sorry to disappoint you, but I agree. Defacing or destroying property is never
a valid response.

Bull.

Destruction of property has a very valid role in aggressive conflict
resolution.  It is a key part of disrupting mobility and supply infrastructure.
  Were I to stage a revolt, careful distruction of property would be the
PRIMARY means of combat.

(that was entirely too much agreement :-)

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: May Day "riots" in London
 
(...) never (...) infrastructure. (...) Oh, sorry about this but.... I agree with you. And with Alex. You're talking about armed insurrection and you are as usual, spot on. Alex is talking about law abiding peaceful demonstration and he is right as (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: May Day "riots" in London
 
(...) Sorry to disappoint you, but I agree. Defacing or destroying property is never a valid response. ++Lar (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

17 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR