Subject:
|
Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 May 2000 18:07:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
808 times
|
| |
|
|
That's assuming we'd use boosters, of course. I figure railguns would be more
foolproof.
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > Heck yeah fission is cleaner. We always seem to be worried about what to do
> > with the spent rods - why not drop them into the sun? It's not like it's
> > going to pollute the sun or anything, and the canisters wouldn't need much of
> > a boost at all.
>
> Booster blows up - you now have radioactive material spread over an extremely
> wide area. And to make the launch somewhat econonomically feasible, you packed
> it to the max. Thankfully, it took off from Florida (which if we recall, is
> going to be flooded anyway) and not Vandenderg in California. ;-)
>
> Bruce
--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
228 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
