Results 1161 – 1180 of 1868.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Apologies to Bruce, et al.
|
| I was getting a little shrill and I apologize. He made very valid points both here and off-line and now that there was a cool-down time for me, I see that. Again, I'm sorry. Go about the business of fine debate. Dave K (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
bruce
(score: 1.609)
|
|
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Bruce, it is clear from your posts you don't understand what true homophobia is. It is irrational fear/hatred of homosexuals. You do corectly point out that it is not mere disagreements concerning homosexual behavior. But a heterosexual being (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.609)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) No Bruce - give me a break - if you can't establish the basis for a discussion there is no discussion. I'll be glad to backup my claims when I make them. For the 4th time - Do you accept my statements as descriptive of the key questions of the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Geology from Outer Space
|
| (...) Bruce (or anyone else, really :-), I have a question related to this, it's something I've pondered on but no teacher I've had could answer to my satisfaction, and it's one that I am honestly curious about and will welcome any answer that I can (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Geology from Outer Space
|
| Bruce Schlickbernd: (...) But that can be reconciled with 6,000 years. When one examines the early Chinese dynasties, one can find that precisely documented dynasties only go back as far as about 2000 B.C. The first true Chinese dynasty was started (...) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| Bruce: You're right, I should have qualified my hypotheticals better, but I DO think that Duane is right when it comes to shooting the "other" person dead -- one story, my story, means I go free. Nobody will ever hear the dead person's narrative of (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Gay Marriage
|
| (...) I did. Notice -->Bruce<-- chose a secondary definition, not the primary one. The cheek:-) (...) THIS IS PRECIOUSLY MY POINT!!! (I'm screaming, but not at you). This is what our kids are being taught! It's REVISIONIST and WRONG! (...) Then I (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: policies
|
| (...) Bruce, you failed to mention perhaps his greatest achievement. When he delivered his speech, it was from the "lowest rostrum in modern presidential conventional history". (what about unconventional history?). I've not seen the pictures, but it (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
| Bruce: No offense, but this is a rather small point you are making. Okay, okay -- reasonableness in the use of firearm is prerequisite. Fine. I don't actually think anyone is arguing with that as a foundation before deadly force is used. I have (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Religion and Science
|
| (...) And yet, Bruce, if I said to you "there is a God who exists as revealed by Jesus of Nazareth", what would be your first response? Maybe you'd say, "that's nice for you, now run along and play" (oops, that's what *Lar* would say). But what if (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| Bruce, you have a valid point in the larger context. I just think it's OK to quote fictional characters if there's merit in the thoughts of the author behind them. That's all. And I think it's OK to quote voices in your head too, but I digress. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
|
| Jon and Bruce are exasperating each other without getting very far, so I thought I'd go back to the beginning of the thread and look at Jon's original statements. I may be falling into his trap, that's OK. I've done it to him before so I guess it's (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) As Bruce and I have pointed out countless times previously, *EVERY* organism that ever lived is a transitional form, fossil or otherwise. Further, my "ad infinitum" comment is a straightforward rhetorical consequence of demanding a (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Robert: Just another Troll
|
| (...) Hey Bruce, watch yer attributions - You're actually replying to your own post ((URL) I really think such long & scathin) replies belong in e-mail, rather than a public post. I'd say the same to Robert / Matthew / Mad / ??? but I feel it would (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) Bruce, you live in Kalifornia, right? You're looking at the world through blinders. MANY states pretty much allow you to shoot first and ask questions later. And if you can prove state of mind, you can walk. You need to head East every once in (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
