To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9858
9857  |  9859
Subject: 
Re: Geology from Outer Space
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:05:01 GMT
Viewed: 
538 times
  
Bruce Schlickbernd:
As I mentioned before, recorded Chinese geneaologies go back further than
6,000 years.  That's why the 10,000 year fudge-factor appeared.

But that can be reconciled with 6,000 years.  When one examines the early
Chinese dynasties, one can find that precisely documented dynasties only go
back as far as about 2000 B.C.  The first true Chinese dynasty was started
then (4,000 years ago) by someone who reportedly "sweetened the waters"
making the land habitable after a wide-spread flood.  The ten dynasties
listed before then tell of men with extremely long life-spans, and
questionable details attributed to them.  From a biblical perspective, after
the flood of Noah's day, people migrated to different parts of the globe.
It is quite likely that the well-documented dynasties date back to the time
one group of people migrated to Asia.  The ten previous dynasties could very
well be faded memories of patriarchs before the flood, when people lived for
900 years or so.

This theory can be reasonably corroborated when one examines the histories
of other peoples that sprang up seemingly for no reason about that
time--Sumerians, Egyptians, Phoenicians, and Indians.  Each of these other
peoples possessed a history containing ten patriarchs in their prehistory.

On another note, all of those groups of people had stories in which a god or
gods created the world, and a flood covered the earth.

--Ryan



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Geology from Outer Space
 
(...) This is an example of what I mentioned earlier about Creationists altering fact to fit their belief system (which should not be dignified with the term theory or hypothesis). (...) If by "Indians" you're referring to Native Americans, then (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Geology from Outer Space
 
(...) Dang, I answered this one in your email. Everyone will have to be mystified as to my response. :-( Oh, I'll cover the very last point again because it's quick: the Sumerians, Egyptian, and Indians all developed their cultures along a major (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Geology from Outer Space
 
(...) I did. That's a short time, astromically speaking. (...) And......? It's still basic bad science to draw the conclusions you are inmplying. (...) As I mentioned before, recorded Chinese geneaologies go back further than 6,000 years. That's why (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

126 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR