|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
| | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| I'm going to address a few selective points here, please excuse me - tonight is my 9th wedding anniversary - goin out for a nice dinner. (...) That is very true. An armed and highly visible guard would have affected his decision, but I would contend (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
| | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) Well, every argument can be beaten down to some foundational principle that is a mere assertion that some may not agree with. I am not sure I have ever seen a philosophical argument that didn't ultimately break down that way. I'd be well (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.388) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.387) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.387) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.387) |
|
| | Re: Waco (time for a Subject change already)
|
| (...) Yes, you've shown yourself to be the polar opposite of someone else in this forum, and I can't understand why you're not debating HIM. To you, it's "all hail the gubmint, which can do no wrong" or "if it's a law, it must be right". The both of (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.387) |