To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11435
11434  |  11436
Subject: 
Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 6 Jul 2001 18:51:38 GMT
Viewed: 
1260 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:

(1) Suppose that you broke into a house, stole a TV, and later found out
that nobody owned the house. Was the act immoral? I'd say so-- because you
*thought* (assumedly) that you *were* being immoral, because you *thought*
that the owners of the TV existed, and that they wouldn't want you to steal
their TV.

  Interestingly (or maybe not--you tell me), something analogous happened to
me a few years ago during a one-on-one meeting with a Scientology "Advocate"
(or whatever their brainwashers are called).  Eventually I got sick of the
crazy rhetoric and decided to get out of there, but I couldn't find a good
point to break in to indicate my desire to leave without sounding rude.  So
I lied, saying that I had to catch a bus, and out the door I went, thinking
that no actual bus would be available and fully expecting to walk home.
However, along came the bus, which I boarded, so my lie was magically
transformed into a truth.  Or was it?  Maybe I'll need to consult with
Hubbard to make that determination.
  By the way, during a 90-minute meeting the Advocate smoked all but two
cigarettes in a pack--an average of one every five minutes for the whole
session!  If that's what Scientology does for you, where do I sign up?

     Dave!



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
(...) It was quite clearly a sign from God that Scientology is in fact stupid. DaveE (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
(...) He'd tell you that you actualised your desire and voila, a bus. Or something like that. Warning, be very careful discussing this particular, ahem, well, whatever it is they are. I hear they have some majorly powerful lawyers and I'd rather (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
(...) Forget the magically appearing bus-- what I find totally amazing is that you actually spent 90 minutes with a Scientology recruiter! What did they do, bar the door shut? Maggie C. (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
Ok, I noticed something odd while mulling over the topic on my way home last night... While I admitted elsewhere that I agree to a certain degree of immorality for eating meat, but that it was negligible, I'm actually not sure that's the case-- at (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR