Results 3781 3800 of about 12000.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| all (score: 0.316) |
|
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) Okay - now, I've deleted all that preceeded this paragraph above because it indulges in everything you just disavowed. There, a clean slate. If you want to go back into the particulars, I'll be only too happy to shoot you down yet again. :-O (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.316) |
|
|
| property (score: 0.316) |
|
| | Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?
|
| (...) That's it, yes! And because of the tenets which hold that... 1) people give their real-life name rather than posting anonymously, and 2) people avoid the use of obseneties/profanities/etc., ...LUGNET is a much more friendly, much less (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights (score: 0.316) |
|
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) I am not questioning your intentions at all - I am trying to bring to your attention the consistently strident, holier-than-thou attitude that undermines the often quite valid points you have to make. Moving back up here after reading through (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.316) |
|
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) It's unsatisfactory to a logical mind. Logic is a tool, but not the end all of inquiry. It has its limitations. Heck, I can use logic to prove that movement is impossible (ask). Applying logic to God is like trying to measure the volume of an (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.316) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.316) |
|
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) It isn't the height of arrogance to claim that anymore than it is the height of arrogance to claim we don't have it right. That is -->Bruce<--'s point. That is also the problem with moral relativism, but I digress. Getting back to "we've got (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.316) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.315) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.315) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.315) |
|
| | Re: Art and Property ZRights
|
| (...) Yah. Right. Show me election results and appropriate laws, then. Maybe you want to dilute your viewpoint to the point where it is acceptable to enough people that you can have a good share of votes, just like the two major parties, but it (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| property (score: 0.315) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.315) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.315) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.315) |
|
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) Like I said, Zeno's Paradox. But 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32... equals 1. Additionally, your formulation demands that space be infinitely divisible, which it is not. (...) "Apt" is yet to be determined, but I admit that it's clever! (...) (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.315) |
|
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) It is a variant of the one Dave K mentioned earlier. Before moving any distance X, the distance 1/2X must be covered. Before moving distance 1/2X, 1/4X distance must be moved, etc. Since there will always be a distance smaller than the one to (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.315) |
|
|
| property (score: 0.315) |
|
| | Re: Art and Property ZRights
|
| (...) Yowza! Sort of, maybe, but I don't think that too many of that majority think its goals are currently realistic, for some of the reasons already addressed in the various Libertopia posts! Dave! (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| property (score: 0.315) |
|
|
| property (score: 0.315) | More: Next Page >>
|