Subject:
|
Re: Art and Property ZRights
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 19:21:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2107 times
|
| |
|
|
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
>
> > I'm going to step out on a limb here, and try and weave something
> > together from the two debates we have going on.
> >
> > ASSERTIONS:
> >
> > 1. Art is something that is created with intent to evoke an emotional
> > response.
>
> Some art is intended to create an intellectual response, not emotional, or as
> an aid to meditation (Mark Rothko's "glowing squares"), or....
You may have a point there, although I would argue that is still an
emotional response.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art and Property ZRights
|
| (...) Some art is intended to create an intellectual response, not emotional, or as an aid to meditation (Mark Rothko's "glowing squares"), or.... (...) Each will assign their own unique value. (...) When Libertarians are the majority party, I'll (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
