To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 1361 – 1380 of about 12000.
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
 
(...) That's true, and more than once I went to great lengths to make the point crystal clear too, with lots of historical references: (URL) 2nd Amendment -- Bare Bones> And gee, that cite is not even that old...last year. I find it annoying when a (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

rights
(score: 0.567)

  Re: Intellectual Property Question
 
(...) I kind of agree with this. The question is how will the world proceed? What new mechanisms will arise to encourage artists to produce? I see a slight potential of a period of time where the availability of new art plummets. Another question is (...) (21 years ago, 23-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

property
(score: 0.567)

  Intellectual Property Question
 
For purposes of this discussion, let's posit that music companies *have* the right to control distribution and to make copies of their products, and also that the consumer is granted the "fair use" right to make personal copies of purchased music. (...) (21 years ago, 22-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

property
(score: 0.567)

  Re: Search for Saddam
 
(...) Don't be silly, 50 years ago they didn't need a scapegoat to keep you in fear and under the belief that you need the government to protect you by taking away your rights. -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.567)

  Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
 
So you accept all the other points I rasied then? And what about all those you snipped in you last reply to me? You are squirming Larry. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.566)

  Re: Imperiled!
 
(...) Sometimes the sarcastic remark, intended to mock when uttered by the speaker, actually contains the germ of the truth. If the legitimacy of our election process is imperiled as greviously as these articles allege (and it's pretty scary stuff, (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

rights
(score: 0.566)

  From Harry Browne
 
Posted in its entirety. Note that I personally do not think it's appropriate to forward this to everyone in your address book as the message advocates, I'm a bit disappointed by that. I only forwarded it to those people that I felt were likely to be (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, property
(score: 0.566)

  Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) I expect that if it takes them a long time to harden, it will take at least as long to soften. And ultimately, I don't know how to do what I'm suggesting. If you can arrange stewardship over a prison and a somewhat increased budget with which (...) (24 years ago, 16-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.566)

  Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
 
(...) Ah. A libertarian economist. Just what is your level of "satisfaction"? (...) If this is so, how can a collective of parents do any better? (...) Hardly objective Larry, you can do better than this. Answer all my points. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.566)

  Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
 
(...) From the definition of "critical" (1) (and I am surprised that I have to explain this to a Doctor, actually. What kind of doctor are you, again?) ... You are "critical" in the sense of 2 a : inclined to criticize severely and unfavorably (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.565)

  Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) No, it's just that you and I disagree. To me the "crime", as you would call it, is the violation of the woman's body. I believe a woman is fully within her rights to have an abortion if she wants to terminate an unwanted pregnancy as long as (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.565)

  Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
 
(...) Scott, think this through, and give an answer: what superior power of decision making does the government (which is a collection of people) have that any other collection of people could have? What makes the legislatures and other government (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.565)

  Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
 
(URL) ran across this from somewhere else) "since Nagorka generally goes to work in the aisles without prior permission from store officials" Except for the above, note how the story doesn't really even mention the fact that this "artist" (scare (...) (21 years ago, 11-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.565)

  Re: My Official Viewpoint
 
(...) 2 posts back... so the >> are not quite right Chris said: (...) Helps? To my way of thinking this particular subthread is not about JarJar per se, or even about real characters vs. fantasy. It's about when is portrayal of the initiation of (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, property
(score: 0.565)

  Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) I have had people in face to face discussions, refuse to ever talk to me again because I supported ideas like this. (Or that sexual encounters between adults and children are not necessarily unhealthy, or that cannibalism isn't evil.) But the (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.565)

  Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
 
(...) PhD ... (...) Yes you are correct. Even though I have a lot of respect for TL, I don't think he is correct all the time. No big deal really. If it were TL could change the T&C. (...) If you mean I don't agree with you, you are correct. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.565)

  Re: More of the Usual Lies
 
(...) I know that MM isn't held with much credbility in these here circles, but 'Dude, where's my country?' may hopefully restore some... (URL) which questions are asked and researched-- " 1. Is it true that the Bin Ladens have had business (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.565)

  Re: What am I missing here?
 
(...) All right, what's the deal? Lar made a general call for forbearance on The Abortion Debate (a good call, since no one is going to be swayed one way or the other) and there have subsequently been more posts than before Lar's request. Even I, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.565)

  Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) Of course, it was emotional. This is an emotionally charged subject. You'll have to pardon me, this was my first time posting to debate and I did not know that one of the rules was that you must leave your emotions at the door. (...) Actually (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.565)

  Re: From Harry Browne
 
Maggie, I don't want to be harsh or insulting, but this basically sounds like what I have been hearing for years from the pro-choice people, and it hasn't put a dent in my way of thinking in all those years. I can empathize with you not wanting (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.565)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR