Subject:
|
Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 15:51:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
226 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jason J. Railton writes:
> You're right. It sucks. It's the easiest subject to fall into debating
> because there's always a good supply of whackos with way-out ideas to fire
> things up. Plus no-one's actually going to listen and change their views,
> and no-one's got any proof, so you can just keep going on ad infinitum.
Well-put. I couldn't have trolled any better myself!
Cheers,
- jsproat
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?)
|
| (...) "trolled", "strawman" - what language are you half-cut bunch of muppets using here anyway? So if you really want to make a good point in a debate, that no one can argue with, you just make up your own language to do it in - is that it? j450n (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?)
|
| (...) Right, now I know what you're on about (thanks Dave) I can comment. That isn't meant to incite an argument, the other bit is. That's meant to point out the futility of the previous debate so no one gives a monkey's when I try to change the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?)
|
| (...) You're right. It sucks. It's the easiest subject to fall into debating because there's always a good supply of whackos with way-out ideas to fire things up. Plus no-one's actually going to listen and change their views, and no-one's got any (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
