 | | Why is religion so hot? —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | Since this is the place the debates about religion happen (or at least should happen :-) I am gonna post this here... Why do you think is religion such a hot topic (no pun intended) of debate on a website dedicated to LEGO? I find it hard to believe (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why is religion so hot? —James Simpson
|
| | | | | (...) I've kind of cooled on the religion debates myself, to the extent that i really don't participate any longer. I think they are somewhat appropriate though, because religious or non-religious sentiment are very real angles of who we all are, (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why is religion so hot? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) This is a valid question. For those of us confident of our views (which is probably everyone here!), it serves as a place to practice articulating those views so that we may ultimately discuss them more rationally. In addition, we learn the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why is religion so hot? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) Because doing so has affected my beliefs. First, understand that you can't just say "this is religion, and this is everything else I believe in". It's all part of one's belief system, ethics system, political system, etc. Religious beliefs (or (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Why is religion so hot? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Good point about separating religious beliefs and the rest of one's being. While I don't think I have changed my religious views based on the direct religious debates, I have been convinced to change my views from a whole perspective. I am (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why is religion so hot? —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) At an offhand guess (because I don't usually partake in other online interfaces that are this open-ended [since we're lucky enough to have the off-topic newsgroup]), I think it's no more prevalant here than it would be elsewhere. Personally, I (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | (...) You're right. It sucks. It's the easiest subject to fall into debating because there's always a good supply of whackos with way-out ideas to fire things up. Plus no-one's actually going to listen and change their views, and no-one's got any (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) Well-put. I couldn't have trolled any better myself! Cheers, - jsproat (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | (...) "trolled", "strawman" - what language are you half-cut bunch of muppets using here anyway? So if you really want to make a good point in a debate, that no one can argue with, you just make up your own language to do it in - is that it? j450n (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) "Troll" is of course common Internet parlance for a person who posts in a manner apparently specifically intended to produce heated and emotional responses. "Straw Man" is a long-standing term for the rhetorical falacy of picking your (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Right. Thanks. Is that 'common' as in 'used by the common folk?' by the way? No, must stop it. :) (...) I learned something today. Marvellous. Anyway, I just wanted to change the subject as I'm sick of this whole religion/flat earth/new (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) And they say that understated humour is lost on the Internet...;) (...) I'm not sure what's patriotic or not patriotic about any of that. Partisan, perhaps, and occasionally pedestrian. ;) best Lindsay (Besides, you can just look at the old (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The reference is to maritime trolling -- the act of fishing by dropping your baited lines in the water and ignoring them for a few hours while you steer the boat. The idea is to let the fish do most of the work -- biting the hook and tiring (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: You shoulda seen the Spy plane that got away (and other fish stories) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Lying on the shore with your hook in the water is the laziest. I've had the most success catching fish by trolling. Fly-fishing is the best fishing, except when the fish bother you by getting caught on your hook. The (2nd) bravest fishing I've (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: You shoulda seen the Spy plane that got away (and other fish stories) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Boy, shows how much *you* know about effortless fishing. The laziest method, of course, involves TNT. The shockwave does the work.[1] (...) A well-placed depth charge could have solved that whole problem. (Okay, you might not have ended up (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: You shoulda seen the Spy plane that got away (and other fish stories) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | (...) What does successfully catching fish have to do with fishing? No, no, too much effort to lob that TNT. Wakes you up, too. Bruce (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) Trolling is what you attempted immediately above: trolling for reactions on the internet rather than trolling for fish in a lake. A "strawman" is not a made-up term: from Encarta Dictionary, "unimportant issue or person: an issue or person of (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | (...) Right, now I know what you're on about (thanks Dave) I can comment. That isn't meant to incite an argument, the other bit is. That's meant to point out the futility of the previous debate so no one gives a monkey's when I try to change the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) Oh, no hard feelings, I grok you, I thought it was a pretty good try. :-, Most people, when they want a new discussion, tend to start a whole new thread, as it more or less completely separates the new discussion from the old. But the new (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
