Subject:
|
Re: Rumor control?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Nov 2000 16:48:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
214 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> >
> > > So, I gotta ask, though, this anti Gore, pro car guy, what was he doing on
> > > Mass Transit instead of enjoying the last few days of freely driving his
> > > 1989 deuce and a quarter before the blacksuited ecotroops came and took it
> > > away?
> >
> > Oh, you know--that durned Clinton and his gas tax are so bad that the honest
> > working man can't even drive his own car anymore!
>
> Well, all I can say to that is look out for Hillary! for prez in '04 (why
> does she get to use an exclamation point?? is it because the mere mention of
> her name is scary?) If you thought the conspiracy theorists were having fun
> now, just wait. (1)
Oh hey! I like that. It'll drive the Republicans up the wall. Almost
worth it from that standpoint alone! :-)
Of course, they'd be worrying needlessly since the first female elected
president will be a conservative (not because Republicans are progressive
and accepting, but precisely because they aren't!).
>
> That's my prediction, no matter whether Gush or Bore is in the house next
> week (month, year, whatever...)
>
> > Dave!
>
> For that matter why do you get to have a bang? (says the pot calling the
> kettle overpunctuated... see MY siggy)
>
> 1 - Hillary is slime, but it's unorganized opportunistic slime. The land
> deal/chicken futures/law firm overbilling/travelgate/foster death/bimbo
> eruption coverups/lost files/etc (to the 99th power) are not some sort of
> vast conspiracy, they're just one venality after another with no overriding
> grand plan other than "make Hillary money/fame/influence and avoid pinning
> anything on her by retaining plausible deniability"
Hillary is a lawyer and now an official politician - why am I not surprised
at any of the above? Seems standard issue (unfortunately).
>
> ++Lar
--->Bruce<--
(nyahhh, nyahhh, nyahhh! Let the over-punctuation wars begin!)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Rumor control?
|
| (...) Well, all I can say to that is look out for Hillary! for prez in '04 (why does she get to use an exclamation point?? is it because the mere mention of her name is scary?) If you thought the conspiracy theorists were having fun now, just wait. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
