Subject:
|
Re: It's All Over...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Nov 2000 02:15:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
358 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Kingsley writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeremiah VanderMark writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Miller writes:
> > > Jeremiah VanderMark <doggybot_37@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
> > > > everything. Who'd have thought that a vote for Nader really *was* a vote for
> > > > Bush...
> > >
> > > No it's not. Although there is some difference between Gore and Bush,
> > > they're both corporatists, they both want to increase military spending,
> > > they both support the death penalty, etc., etc., etc.
> > >
> > > A vote for Nader is *not* chosing the lesser of two evils.
> >
> > Ah, but you've got to look at the rest of the government right now -
> > Republican Senate and House, and, should Bush win, more Rep judges. That's a
> > big step backwards this country doesn't need.
>
> While I agree with you to an extent I wouldn't worry too much in that while the
> Republican's will have a majority in the House and Senate it is not enough of a
> majority to do whatever they want. Especially in the Senate the Dem's have
> enough seats to create deadlock when they need to.
>
> The judges are my main concern.
>
> I would also say however that I predicted before the election that whoever won
> would not get re-elected in 2004. My reasoning is that the economy is probably
> going to at least slow considerably if not go into recession. The new
> president, whoever it is, will get blamed for that, deserved or not.
>
> We need viable 3rd party's in the states and I don't think the Green's or the
> Libitarians are viable. I think the Reform party had a shot but Buchanan
> destroied them. So I don't know where we will get a viable 3rd party from but
> it is badly needed to shake up the establishment
Ventura 2004!!! :c)
Really, though. If he ran, I and the majority of people I've talked to
would vote for him.
-Jeremiah-
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: It's All Over...
|
| (...) While I agree with you to an extent I wouldn't worry too much in that while the Republican's will have a majority in the House and Senate it is not enough of a majority to do whatever they want. Especially in the Senate the Dem's have enough (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
