Subject:
|
Re: It's All Over...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Nov 2000 19:08:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
338 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Miller writes:
> Jeremiah VanderMark <doggybot_37@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
> > everything. Who'd have thought that a vote for Nader really *was* a vote for
> > Bush...
>
> No it's not. Although there is some difference between Gore and Bush,
> they're both corporatists, they both want to increase military spending,
> they both support the death penalty, etc., etc., etc.
>
> A vote for Nader is *not* chosing the lesser of two evils.
Ah, but you've got to look at the rest of the government right now -
Republican Senate and House, and, should Bush win, more Rep judges. That's a
big step backwards this country doesn't need.
-Jeremiah-
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: It's All Over...
|
| (...) While I agree with you to an extent I wouldn't worry too much in that while the Republican's will have a majority in the House and Senate it is not enough of a majority to do whatever they want. Especially in the Senate the Dem's have enough (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: It's All Over...
|
| (...) No it's not. Although there is some difference between Gore and Bush, they're both corporatists, they both want to increase military spending, they both support the death penalty, etc., etc., etc. A vote for Nader is *not* chosing the lesser (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
