 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | (...) I thought the anti-religion stance states that the last refuge of religion is to convert people by the sword. But again, quite sarcastically, I digress... (...) But that's still subjective, isn't it? The interpretation of this data is still (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | Good point (...) But is it a dichotomy or a trichotomy. (rational/irrational vs. rational/not rational/irrational)... I'd say the latter. As I was alluding to in a different portion of the thread, I can have and enjoy emotions without letting them (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes [and I re-arranged]: (...) Ooh. It appears that my argument has no support for such a trichotomy. My kneejerk reaction is that you're pointing out a flaw in my semantics rather than my logic, but (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'd still go with Shrugged. Go buy it and if you're really pressed for time, just read Galt's speech, which is only 100 pages or so (quite a bit much for a radio speech but what the heck...). It starts around page 700 or so IIRC (I'd go look (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Who's John Galt? <ducks> ;) --Karim (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) $ (the sign of the dollar) <... and grins> (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | (...) Ayn Rand's philosophy is not a derivation, or long list of concepts implying one another out of thin air with "Logic" hopefully proved true at some point in the chain. If you have to refer to Godel for supplemental reading, you don't get (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | I'll defer to Erik who is much more knowledgable. As I've said before, being convinced by an argument and being able to reproduce the argument accurately enough to convince others are two different things. Rand convinced me. I may not have all the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | (...) This is interesting... In one of my college english classes, I wrote a term paper that used chaos theory & fractal geometery to argue that "Free Will" is a contradiction of terms because, following the theory of mathematical chaos, because the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) I have understood that chaos theory implied that the universe was holistic and non-deterministic. That is, certain behaviors can be modeled with some degree of accuracy, but the large number of outside influences would always prevent 100% (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | (...) Flub. Messed up on the order of my footnotes and I can't cancel from the Web interface. I hope my meaning came across... Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | | (...) The primary tenants of Chaos Theory are 1) The universe is deterministic. 2) The universe is chaotic. Put simply, you were correct, in that for all intents and purposes, it is impossible for us to make long-term predictions of chaotic systems (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Erik Olson
|
| | | | (...) well, I was only considering the arena of ideas... (...) Objectivity is usually taken to mean "independent of the observer." Since it's impossible to NOT be an observer of the universe, therefore, objectivity is impossible, goes the argument. (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
