To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 4842
4841  |  4843
Subject: 
Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:36:03 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@IHATESPAMnovera.com
Viewed: 
1544 times
  
I'll defer to Erik who is much more knowledgable. As I've said before,
being convinced by an argument and being able to reproduce the argument
accurately enough to convince others are two different things.

Rand convinced me.

I may not have all the details right any more to where I can reproduce
them but I assert they're pretty much wired into me at this point.

His post on the other thread is an excellent summation. Way better than
I could ever do. I continue to have some issues with Rand around the
edges but they're minor (for instance, why do all her characters smoke
cigarettes, but she had such an anti pot stance? Nicotine alters mood
and perception, so does caffeine...) quibbles at best.

Erik Olson wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
As to where to start, again, I chicken out from a full derivation and
point to Rand,....

Ayn Rand's philosophy is not a derivation, or long list of concepts implying one
another out of thin air with "Logic" hopefully proved true at some point in the
chain.

If you have to refer to Godel for supplemental reading, you don't get Rand's
idea of logic. See my other post.

--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.

Note: this is a family forum!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
 
(...) Ayn Rand's philosophy is not a derivation, or long list of concepts implying one another out of thin air with "Logic" hopefully proved true at some point in the chain. If you have to refer to Godel for supplemental reading, you don't get (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR