 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Gregory J. Overkamp
|
| | | (...) I think its clear to me and everyone else that if there were other names involved in this, there would be no discussion. However, as this thread goes on, there is more and more speculation, name calling, flaming, etc. going on. Since Dave and (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) **snip** We Daves know many stories, some of them true. I suspect that you probably meant Dan in this context, but on behalf of my namesakes I thank you for including us! Dave! (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) And some of them not true, but hilariously funny, nonetheless. (...) Normally I'd probably agree, but in this situation I kinda feel like I've been "included" on a field trip to the local minefield... "No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | My post was based only on undisputed comments. Scott A (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) No -- it is not undisputed that the reason he was banned was a TOS violation. He broke it, was corrected, and made an earnest attempt to comply. After his attempt to comply he was banned without recourse. -Tim (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) Can you please define what you mean by "earnest"? Are you saying his "earnest attempt" put him inside the ToS? (...) You or I would have deleted the whole of the text and shrugged the matter off. Larry tried to play it smart and it backfired. (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops. —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | | | (...) It does not matter what Tim thinks is inside or outside the ToS. It is not his call to make. Obviously, Dan thought it was not inline with the ToS - and thats really the only view that means anything here - right? Mark P LoB (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) Given that Tim wants to line Larry up for martyrdom: NO. ;) Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops. —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) Mark, What are you trying to gain by the repetition of this idea? We get it. You think that we don't have a right to an opinion. I happen to disagree. If you're merely pointing out that we don't have the power to change anything over at BL, (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops. —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | | | (...) Chris - I have said countless times in the last few days in direct regards to this situation - I am not trying to tell anybody they can not have, or voice thier opinion. But when you base your opinion on false information that some people (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops. —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | | | (...) I would say that it would be more productive to ask Dan to state his side of the story, rather than try to convince everyone else to shut up. The only way we will get Dan's side of the story is if *Dan speaks up*. If he does not, BL's (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops. —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | | | (...) Tom, do me a favor - copy this over, paste in in your word editor, print it up and post it above your monitor: I am not, and have not told anybody to shut up. I have not, and am not telling anybody to not have or voice their opinion. Can you (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Alan Findlay
|
| | | | (...) The following posts shed light on this: (URL) on these, I don't believe that Larry's correction was earnest, but rather calculating. My guess (yes, it's a guess)is that it was the phrase "Until perpetual stock is implemented," that was the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | (...) And until Dan speaks up, we'll never know. Personally, *with what I currently have to go on*, Dan's reaction was overblown, and Larry's attempt to meet ToS was earnest. Only Dan can prove that wrong. -- Tom Stangl *(URL) Visual FAQ home *(URL) (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
