To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25460
25459  |  25461
Subject: 
Re: suspended Bricklink shops
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:53:06 GMT
Viewed: 
4338 times
  
Alan Findlay wrote:

> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > > My post was based only on undisputed comments.
> > > 
> > > Scott A
> > 
> > No -- it is not undisputed that the reason he was banned was a TOS violation.
> > He broke it, was corrected, and made an earnest attempt to comply. After his
> > attempt to comply he was banned without recourse.
> > 
> > -Tim
> 
> The following posts shed light on this:
> http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=63847
> http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=63963
> 
> Based on these, I don't believe that Larry's correction was earnest, but rather
> calculating. My guess (yes, it's a guess)is that it was the phrase "Until
> perpetual stock is implemented," that was the point of contention. Larry wanted
> a certain service added to BL, Dan either couldn't or wouldn't add it, so Larry
> engaged in calculated civil disobedience. Dan called him on it and Larry made a
> show of 'complying' while still maintaining his disobedience, so he's out.

And until Dan speaks up, we'll never know.

Personally, *with what I currently have to go on*, Dan's reaction was overblown,
and Larry's attempt to meet ToS was earnest.

Only Dan can prove that wrong.


--
Tom Stangl
*http://www.vfaq.com/
*DSM Visual FAQ home
*http://www.vfaq.net/
*Prius Visual FAQ Home



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: suspended Bricklink shops
 
(...) The following posts shed light on this: (URL) on these, I don't believe that Larry's correction was earnest, but rather calculating. My guess (yes, it's a guess)is that it was the phrase "Until perpetual stock is implemented," that was the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR