Subject:
|
Re: suspended Bricklink shops.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:32:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1791 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
My post was based only on undisputed comments.
Scott A
|
No -- it is not undisputed that the reason he was banned was a TOS violation.
He broke it, was corrected, and made an earnest attempt to comply.
|
Can you please define what you mean by “earnest”?
Are you saying his “earnest attempt” put him inside the ToS?
| |
After his
attempt to comply he was banned without recourse.
|
You or I would have deleted the whole of the text and shrugged the matter off.
Larry tried to play it smart and it backfired. Big deal.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops.
|
| (...) It does not matter what Tim thinks is inside or outside the ToS. It is not his call to make. Obviously, Dan thought it was not inline with the ToS - and thats really the only view that means anything here - right? Mark P LoB (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: suspended Bricklink shops
|
| (...) No -- it is not undisputed that the reason he was banned was a TOS violation. He broke it, was corrected, and made an earnest attempt to comply. After his attempt to comply he was banned without recourse. -Tim (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
