Subject:
|
Re: suspended Bricklink shops.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:58:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1781 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Papenfuss wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > > > My post was based only on undisputed comments.
> > > >
> > > > Scott A
> > >
> > > No -- it is not undisputed that the reason he was banned was a TOS
> > > violation. He broke it, was corrected, and made an earnest attempt to
> > > comply.
> >
> > Can you please define what you mean by "earnest"?
> >
> > Are you saying his "earnest attempt" put him inside the ToS?
>
> It does not matter what Tim thinks is inside or outside the ToS. It is not his
> call to make. Obviously, Dan thought it was not inline with the ToS - and thats
> really the only view that means anything here - right?
Given that Tim wants to line Larry up for martyrdom: NO. ;)
Scott A
>
> Mark P
> LoB
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops.
|
| (...) It does not matter what Tim thinks is inside or outside the ToS. It is not his call to make. Obviously, Dan thought it was not inline with the ToS - and thats really the only view that means anything here - right? Mark P LoB (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
