 | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | Hello! (...) Yes. Those people think Nazi symbols and uniforms are cool because of the background, not because of their sheer look. And who thinks things with that background are "cool" is an idiot. That's what I think. I don't deny the fascination (...) (20 years ago, 19-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Neb Okla
|
| | | | | "Johannes 'Jojo' Koehler" <chutspe@gmx.net> wrote in message news:I2pBv7.1uJp@lugnet.com... (...) I disagree. I recognize the amazing talent of Nazi designers of the time. Their engineers especially, but also their graphic designers. Nazi (...) (20 years ago, 19-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | | | | Hello! (...) Yes, the Nazis were quite good at this. And you may be intelligent enough to differentiate between the aesthetic shape of the Nazi brand and the not at all excusable ideology. But I highly doubt everybody is able to differ or even wants (...) (20 years ago, 19-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Neb Okla
|
| | | | | | "Johannes 'Jojo' Koehler" <chutspe@gmx.net> wrote in message news:I2psB6.I3w@lugnet.com... (...) because (...) How does collecting dishes hurt society? People collect all kinds of things used by famous figures in history. Their fascination is more (...) (20 years ago, 20-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | | | | Hello! (...) It does not. (...) And that's why people like SS uniforms and find them cool? (...) That's true. And I regularly get pleasantly surprised by a better reality than I had assumed beforehand. Better, not best. (...) That's a possible (...) (20 years ago, 21-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Neb Okla
|
| | | | | | "Johannes 'Jojo' Koehler" <chutspe@gmx.net> wrote in message news:I2t532.230G@lugnet.com... (...) I think people do things for different reasons, and rather than judge people based on our own worst fears and worries, we should try to find the truth (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Kyoto —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) The "world against the USA" paranoia aside, your argument does have some merit. That said, your post brings two points to mind: Bush should have renegotiated the treaty instead of ripping it up. How do you think we should protect the (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | | | | Hello! (...) That's an optimistic view on people's behaviour. I wished I was that optimistic (no sarcasm intended). However, everybody including me should always be aware of what impression one's particular behaviour, fashion or whatever makes on (...) (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) I'm not a moderator or anything, but I think the intention was really to prevent people from posting non-Lego things, and not really offensive things. So if someone wants to post Lego porn or Lego violence, that's potentially acceptable (if I (...) (20 years ago, 19-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) What about images with clone brand bricks? I ask for two reasons, the second of which is that these faux-Reich models include a considerable number of MEGABLOKS elements. If clones are verboten, then the pictures could be bounced for that (...) (20 years ago, 19-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) AFAIK, clones are OK on Brickshelf. It would be useful if Kevin posted a rough indication of the guidelines he uses though. ROSCO (20 years ago, 19-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf? —Neb Okla
|
| | | | "Ross Crawford" <rosscraw@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:I2pwDy.12H2@lugnet.com... (...) rough (...) Funny, I find clone bricks offensive. :P It's a lot easier to moderate if you have vague guidelines. (20 years ago, 20-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
