To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24976
24975  |  24977
Subject: 
Re: American Idolatry
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 04:42:40 GMT
Viewed: 
905 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:

   but I support the right of the people to burn the flags in protest, even if I wouldn’t do that myself.

This is what I’m talking about. You support the right, but wouldn’t actually perform the action. May I ask why not?

Because it’s a freedom of speech issue. Same as I support the right of the KKK to march, wear silly sheets, and say mean things(1), while choosing not to actually march, sheetify, or mean-emit with them.

Some constitutional scholar you are!

What I was driving at is: if you were to express dissatisfaction, why wouldn’t you choose to burn a flag? I was never questioning the right to do it; I was questioning the wisdom of doing it.

JOHN



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: American Idolatry
 
(...) Because it's a freedom of speech issue. Same as I support the right of the KKK to march, wear silly sheets, and say mean things(1), while choosing not to actually march, sheetify, or mean-emit with them. Some constitutional scholar you are! (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

27 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR