 | | I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Chris Phillips
|
| | | It's a really good thing that Bush is standing by Rummy through the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal. This means that George is caught in a classic Monkey Trap. In the jungle, they capture monkeys by cutting a hole in a coconut shell, chaining it to a (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) Let's just wait and see where the voting public lash their canoes... Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) [snip] (...) I think the part about the sinking ship may be just wishful thinking on the part of the democrats, but time will tell. Anyhow, what I'm wondering is what makes you feel this current administration is any more arrogant than the (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | | (...) I have seen the writing on the wall for Bush ever since he dragged us into an unjustified war. His administration has repeatedly shown signs that they have completely mis-read the situation in Iraq from the beginning, and it was sadly doomed (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | Ok, let me try again. I understand you don't like Bush, but I asked what you like about Kerry, or Nader, or anybody else. Is there nothing to like about them other than they're not GWB? You can't win an election on that. (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, you *can* win an election on that. But Ok, here goes... + Kerry, by all accounts, served his country with honor and bravery in Viet Nam, even though he could easily have dodged military service the way that Bush and Cheney did. On (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't actually like him. In fact I cringe whenever I hear him speak. Probably the born again affectations that disturb me. Anyhow, I'm not as smart as you, so I can't really put into words why he's got my vote so far. Probably it's the war (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | | | | (...) Don, I've never thought of you this way, so I assume you are being sarcastic? I myself am very passionate about the upcoming election simply because there is so much at stake. I've watched in horror over the past 3.5 years as our government (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | | | (...) No, I really felt pretty bad about it when I posted. I shouldn't be in .debate because I don't know what I'm talking about. I have to figure out a way to get mozilla to drop the extra slash from my lugnet history entry: (URL) way the .debate (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hah! If you want a good laugh, go back and find some of my early posts from 1999 and 2000--then you'll see someone who doesn't know what he's talking about. Heck, for that matter, some would likely argue that I still don't know what I'm (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | (...) omgoodness--I'm sitting in some presentation or other that has nothign to do with IS, bored out of my tree, with my laptop running, and I read this. Almost cost me my job there Dave!! ;) (...) Dave K -show me a dangerous Canadian lunatic and (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) There goes Canada again, blaming the US for its unemployment problems. You should have thought of that before you broke into Mike P's house. Dave! (21 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Damm those lunatic Canadians!! btw, how did we get into such a state of affairs that the next election in Canada and the next election in the US of A are "the most important elections ever", as people are stating. Is this, what's the (...) (21 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Does that include the "Pop Idol" finals? Scott A (21 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hehe David, I guess you're almost sorry not to have the Bloc Québécois to vote for now, don't you? Because what choice do Ontarians have? Paul MArtin the scumbag or Stephen Harper the right-wing extremist. Or you could waste your vote (or (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Vote for a party whose platform is to break up Canada? Probably not Though, to be said, at least the Bloc stands for something, instead of this vague 'give us your money so we can waste it on stuff...' Beyond that, whereas I'd prefer a chance (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I won't get into that debate again, but thank you for respecting my choice. I'm a separatist, as you canadian folks call us. I've never been canadian at heart. The point, however, is not to break Canada. It's to have our own Country. Québec. (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | (...) It's the 'Murica that just grates like nails on a blackboard. But who am I to speak? I say "T'ranna" for Toronto. (...) Hey! I'm the hick here! The loud mouthed "Canada da bomb, USA SuxOrs!!" Well, no, not really. But the hick part is mostly (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes. I am curator for all of .off-topic, including .debate However by choice I have not done anything to the sidebar of this group (unlike .fun or .geek) (...) Yes. Send me (or Frank) a list (urls preferred) of any and all posts you want (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote: <snip> (...) While que question is not addressed to me, I will try to answer it for myself. Of course, I am Québécois, so I don't have to vote, but here's my answer anyway. Kerry, as I understand it, (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Terry Prosper wrote: This should make things clearer... Basically what I tried to explain, in better words. (URL) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, but it's not enough for me. I was looking for more info about Kerry, but clearly I don't write well enough to convey that question here. That's ok though, the internet's a big place. I'll find it. (...) It's not what I asked for, but (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
