To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23695
23694  |  23696
Subject: 
Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 19:41:50 GMT
Viewed: 
1782 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:

<snip>

> racy questions or Jolene Blalock's bared Vulcan butt are only verboten
> because of prudish fears that we would all destroy ourselves if we suddenly
> remembered that we're flesh and blood.
> 
> Dave!

She's the 'daily hottie' today, coincidence of coincidences...

http://leasticoulddo.com

(there'd be a PG-13 rating on that site--no nudity but some verrry nice pics
from the likes of Maxim--so if ya don't like to view scantily clad females (or
males--whatever floats yer boat), don't go clicking--you've been warned...)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) Of course, there's absolutely no way to implement that policy effectively, or to police it credibly, unless we have a clear, precise, and consistent definition of what qualifies as pornography. Who would care to posit such a definition? (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

22 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR