To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23695
23694  |  23696
Subject: 
Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 19:41:50 GMT
Viewed: 
249 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:

<snip>

racy questions or Jolene Blalock's bared Vulcan butt are only verboten
because of prudish fears that we would all destroy ourselves if we suddenly
remembered that we're flesh and blood.

Dave!

She's the 'daily hottie' today, coincidence of coincidences...

http://leasticoulddo.com

(there'd be a PG-13 rating on that site--no nudity but some verrry nice pics
from the likes of Maxim--so if ya don't like to view scantily clad females (or
males--whatever floats yer boat), don't go clicking--you've been warned...)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) Of course, there's absolutely no way to implement that policy effectively, or to police it credibly, unless we have a clear, precise, and consistent definition of what qualifies as pornography. Who would care to posit such a definition? (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

22 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR