To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23682
23681  |  23683
Subject: 
Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:22:42 GMT
Viewed: 
192 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:

   John may not know what hypocrite means, but I do.

I have only recently returned from a family vacation and was content to lurk around a while, but since my name was envoked, I thought I’d comment on Alanis’ behavior and the pious criticism of America’s “prudishness”.

Let’s cut to the chase, shall we. Let me ask you Dave, you freedom-loving Canadian you. Since you are SO freedom-loving (and we aren’t), do you believe ANY kind of censorship is warranted?

If you answered “NO”, then we have nothing to talk about. If you answered “YES”, then we are the same in kind, but different in degree. Now the term “hypocrite” might start creeping into the conversation, but let’s let that tired epithet go for a good while. I think it is a bit silly to boast that you as a culture tolerant X more than culture Y does. What ever happened to viva la differance?

The irony is that, in theory, I am against governmental censorship. What I ferverantly believe in is personal censorship-- that is, personal responsibility and civility. That is why I rant on about morality so much, because immoral people act irresponsibly and need a government to be their moral compass. How rich is that idea! I am a conservative because I believe in limited government, and if everyone behaved we’d need less of it!

And speaking (elsewhere actually) of the American porn industry (which may or may not be the BEST in the world;-) I would say this. Though I personally find it sad and degrading, I wouldn’t deny anyone’s right to participate in it. But I would sure as hell expect those that do to take great lengths to insure that it is consumed only by adults (which of course they don’t), and that is immoral and wrong.

I’m hoping that the proposed .XXX config goes through and all porn must be changed over to this domain so that there is never any mistaking it or stumbling upon it by children.

And that is all I have to say about that;-)

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) (URL) we're back to Howard Stern--if you don't like what he has to say (and I don't) then for the love of freedom of choice, turn the radio station. As far as censorship goes--to that old arguement 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre is wrong (unless (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote: <snip> (...) Canadians and boring kinda go hand in hand... Waittaminit... Anyway, not so much a protest against nudity, rather a protest against censorship and the furor caused by Janet's boob-- (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

22 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR