To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23691
23690  |  23692
Subject: 
Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:46:55 GMT
Viewed: 
268 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:

   You’re forgetting that you were forewarned that the half-time show was being brought to you by the letters M and TV. Even with that ‘heads up’, you still sit there and say “I didn’t know the halftime show was going to be tasteless!”?

Let’s not indulge in sophistries.

  
  
And you keep saying “covered nipple” - it wasn’t (well, maybe from the side to some degree).

The actual nipple was covered. At least, that’s what I saw in all the pictures. Her breast was exposed, and the nip was covered by that wannabe throwing star. And for that brief flash during the actual show--none of this ‘slow motion’ zoom in things that CNN, et al. had going on, you didn’t have the time to see nuttin’! (much to the regret of all 17 year old guys watching the Superbowl that day, but all they had to do was wait 4 hours before the media circus that ensued to see the ‘bare facts’)

What part of, “it wasn’t,” wasn’t clear? :-)

The star fits over the nipple and has a hole in the middle that the nipple thrusts through (oh, hey, for a technical explanation, that turned out a bit steamy). The nipple is exposed. “Covered aureole,” would be correct.

   Ahh, one of the 7 words you can’t say on radio. George Carlin was well ahead of his time.

I could swear (so to speak) that I just said that they did say it on the radio. :-)

It was just a radio station making its own rules for itself.
  
That, for me, is the bottom line. I don’t like rap music, therefore I’m not going to listen to a rap music station. I don’t like MTV, therefore I’m not going to watch MTV or things produced by MTV. Now if I happen to be channel surfing and I hear rap music, or see an MTV video, I’m not going to write to my MP and call for a ban or a CRTC investigation--I’m going to accept the idea that stuff like this is out there and if I don’t like it, I can just turn it off.

I abhor horror movies. Yet I still see the commercials on the telly for them. These commercials run considerably longer than Jacksons exposed boob yet covered nipple. Yet that’s part of life. Getting the feds involved is inviting in censorship and abdicating personal responsibility. I’m not willing to do that.


The commercials are approved (censored if you prefer) for TV, so I’m not sure what your point is.

-->Bruce<--



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) You're forgetting that you were forewarned that the half-time show was being brought to you by the letters M and TV. Even with that 'heads up', you still sit there and say "I didn't know the halftime show was going to be tasteless!"? (...) The (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

22 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR