| |
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> I think you need Todd to speak to why he has chosen to make the
> technology decisions he has, assuming he wants to speak to it, but
> he chose not to support standard NNTP before. If he doesn't speak to
> it, that's his perogative.
Actually, that's what I was hoping for when I asked the question.
For Todd to think about it for a few seconds and then decide if there
was possibly a way to make an improvement to lugnet without a whole
lot of effort. Instead I got you, telling me it's not even needed
because it works just fine for you. That's so selfish. Lugnet
works great for me too, but that doesn't mean all improvements
should cease just because I'm happy.
Anyhow, I set FUT to debate since we're way past the suggestion
part of this thread.
Happy Thanksgiving,
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Message awaiting authentication
|
| (...) Where did I say that? I can think of a host of things I'd like to see added (and have made suggestions about them in the past) and I would in no way equate my saying "I'm not someone that says that a private service has to accomodate all (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Message awaiting authentication
|
| (...) I'm pretty sure I'm not missing the point, which is that LUGNET isn't actually standard NNTP and doesn't have standard NNTP needs, for good and valid reasons according to its owners. Further, no matter how wonderful a standard is, if it's not (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
