Subject:
|
Re: Message awaiting authentication
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:47:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
460 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Don Heyse wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Thomas Garrison wrote:
> > I don't get this. The LUGNET limitation would be that posting setup is
> > HTTP-based, but I think it's all text, really. After that, HTTP is an
> > *option*, but you can get by (better, IMHO) with SMTP or SMTP and NNTP.
> > I'm not seeing how someone who can do NNTP would have trouble with
> > SMTP---heck, I use the same client for both[1].
>
> I give up. Maybe you're right. I just thought I'd make a suggestion
> that could possibly make lugnet better. Who knew I was straying into
> debate territory. Let's everyone chant together. Lugnet is perfect!
> Lugnet is perfect! Change is bad...
Who said that? I'm not seeing that in this thread, although the thread (and
other related ones) has some aspects of "usenet is better because it is free"
koolaid drinking to it. So it may be that there's some rigidity present, yes...
just not where you think.
> Since I'm done with the suggestion part, I've set FUT to debate.
>
> Have fun,
>
> Don
>
> PS. For debate material, the "one true client to rule them all" is
> EMACS.
How is this debate material? Everyone who knows anything knows it is true. You
need to try harder if you want to stir up a debate...
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
