Subject:
|
Re: So?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 07:54:58 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIENIAZEK@NOVERA.COMspamless
|
Viewed:
|
389 times
|
| |
|
|
I agree. If cost is no object, MIT is clearly in the top 5 in the world
(along with CalTech)...
Eric Kingsley wrote:
> Anyway I did not mean to get into a debate over this but sometimes
> you don't allways get what you want. :) .
As long as you get what you neeeed... :-) (or is a stones reference
dating me?)
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: So?
|
| (...) Better than a Stones groupie dating you! :-, Sorry to pick on you, Lar, but I'm feeling indestructable today. I should be behaving better once I get ahold of some Denverite... Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 28-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: So?
|
| (...) I guess I should have learned by know that there is no such thing as a casual statement here. I did not mean to get into a big debate on this but I do agree that if cost is a factor then MIT is probably not quite what it is as when you take (...) (25 years ago, 28-Sep-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ma.bos, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
