Subject:
|
Re: Unexplained power outages in New York, Toronto, and other cities
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:13:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
172 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
> Yet I can't help but wonder why the government covertly prevents the
> de-centralization of power generation. They have to maintain their control
> over the people I guess.
There are plenty of reasons to be paranoid about the current administration,
but that sounds a little too paranoid for my tastes.
I think that some of the main arguments against decentralization are:
1) The expense of switching from the existing system to the proposed one
2) The fact that the aggregate expense of such a system would likely vastly
exceed the continued expense of the existing centralized system
3) The physical/mechanical limitations upon where and how power can be
generated
4) The difficulties of upkeep of so many decentralized systems
5) The overwhelming financial interests of the corporations involved
5 is probably the biggest single reason, but the others are valid, as well. You
would have to demonstrate that alternative methods of power
generation/distribution are (in the aggregate) more practical, cost-effective,
and persuasive than the current system.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
