Subject:
|
Re: Comparative freedom
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:33:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
412 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Pedro Silva writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
>
> > > What else--oh, we're not beholden to a piece of paper written 200+ years
> > > ago. We make our own laws 'n such for what we need them to be, for us
> > > citizens living *now* :p
> >
> > I'm not impressed by a country that had to ask the permission of a Queen to
> > conduct it's own business. Give me the 200+ year old document that told the
> > royalty to bugger off!
>
> Actually, they did not told the Queen to bugger off... because they did not
> have to; they got their own PM instead. Given that the Crown has little (if
> any) effective power, it is even better: getting independent whilst assuring
> a powerful friend (1).
David (no "!") understood what I was refering to - technically everything
Canada did was supposed to be approved by the Queen until that last vestige
of empire was officially expunged a couple of decades ago. I was
embarrassed for my Canadian friends until then.
> Had the USA chosen the same path, and they wouldn't have had a Civil War.
> Thinking of which, the Canadian Way may actually have been a good way,
> wouldn't you say? (2)
What worked for Canada wasn't going to work for the U.S. We just weren't
wimpy enough. ;-)
Nor were we worried about a counter-revolution by the French and the
necessity for support from the Crown in maintaining what we swiped from
another European power. :-O
Bruce
(just teasing....)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Comparative freedom
|
| (...) Yes, Pedro was right--Quebec did not want to 'bring the constitution home' for they could appeal to a highter authority than the Canadian Supreme court if they were denied something from the Supreme Court. The separatists wanted a higher (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Comparative freedom
|
| (...) Actually, they did not told the Queen to bugger off... because they did not have to; they got their own PM instead. Given that the Crown has little (if any) effective power, it is even better: getting independent whilst assuring a powerful (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
