To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18245
18244  |  18246
Subject: 
Re: Comparative freedom
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 00:24:06 GMT
Viewed: 
460 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Pedro Silva writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:

What else--oh, we're not beholden to a piece of paper written 200+ years
ago.  We make our own laws 'n such for what we need them to be, for us
citizens living *now* :p

I'm not impressed by a country that had to ask the permission of a Queen to
conduct it's own business.  Give me the 200+ year old document that told the
royalty to bugger off!

Actually, they did not told the Queen to bugger off... because they did not
have to; they got their own PM instead. Given that the Crown has little (if
any) effective power, it is even better: getting independent whilst assuring
a powerful friend (1).

David (no "!") understood what I was refering to - technically everything
Canada did was supposed to be approved by the Queen until that last vestige
of empire was officially expunged a couple of decades ago.  I was
embarrassed for my Canadian friends until then.

Yes, Pedro was right--Quebec did not want to 'bring the constitution home'
for they could appeal to a highter authority than the Canadian Supreme court
if they were denied something from the Supreme Court.  The separatists
wanted a higher authority if they wver got around to winning their
separatist referendum.  More than likely the Canadian Supreme court would
deny the separation, and therefore the separatists could appeal to someone
else to make the separation all 'leagal-like'.

Evidentily, no one was paying attention on how to successfully pull off a
revolution.  Wimps!  :-)


I personally wouldn't want the separation to happen--I'd rather work at the
root issue of why my brothers and sisters in La Belle Province feel like
they're not getting their fair due in the best country in the world--but
that's a story for another time.

Oh, alright, I don't particularly want to see Canada broken up either
(Canadians are too darn peaceful - ya shoulda shot DeGaul when you had the
chance) - but if the west coast of the US was to split off that would be
cool.....


But we did get our constitution in '82.  So there you are.


In an embarrassing fashion, though.  Put a bag over your collective heads.


Had the USA chosen the same path, and they wouldn't have had a Civil War.
Thinking of which, the Canadian Way may actually have been a good way,
wouldn't you say? (2)

What worked for Canada wasn't going to work for the U.S.  We just weren't
wimpy enough.  ;-)

Sometimes, nay, most times, in the long run, the stronger, smarter, better
person is the one who doesn't throw a punch.  Evolution, as another thread
went on about, is the path of choice for the fittest ;)

Don't start the evolution argument again!  No, no, no!



Nor were we worried about a counter-revolution by the French and the
necessity for support from the Crown in maintaining what we swiped from
another European power.  :-O

Bruce
(just teasing....)

Yes, thank goodness the 'Mericans didn't go thru a revolution every time the
wind changed direction ;)

But we have all these guns just in case.  We love throwing a party!


As for swiping from another European power--don't get the reference, but
Canada didn't swite anything

Canada...homage to English Crown...French people forced into this by
invading British...voted on peacefully, I'm sure.  :-)

Bruce



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Comparative freedom
 
(...) Yes, Pedro was right--Quebec did not want to 'bring the constitution home' for they could appeal to a highter authority than the Canadian Supreme court if they were denied something from the Supreme Court. The separatists wanted a higher (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

12 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR