Subject:
|
Re: Netiquette Question (was Re: Legal Education? etc. )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 04:57:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
572 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Maggie Cambron writes:
> My guess, though, is that Chris appreciates the research you did but either
> got sidetracked or just didn't think a thanks is a big deal.
This is exactly what I think happened.
> I agree with DaveE, you can use your reaction as a gauge for how much effort
> you care to put into any subsequent request for info from a particular party.
That is probably good advice in many instances. But generally I guage my
efforts by how amusing it is TO ME to make the response. Yes, if you can
believe it -- I entertain myself this way at times.
> C'mon, Richard, you know he's just an overrated misogynistic pornographer--
> that "pamphleteer of the French Revolution" crap was just spin doctoring by
> his well connected relatives.
Maybe down the line, in his own lifetime his closest relatives were more
like a noose around his neck. But no matter what, to me he shall always be
"The Divine Marquis" -- patron saint to all misogynistic pornographers
everywhere! =)
http://members.aol.com/blueofnoon/ and more particularly:
http://members.aol.com/blueofnoon/ethics.htm but especially:
http://members.aol.com/blueofnoon/dialogue.htm
http://members.aol.com/blueofnoon/sadequot.htm
Now all I need is six women and some dog meat...
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
