To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16807
16806  |  16808
Subject: 
Re: Netiquette Question (was Re: Legal Education? etc. )
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 21:01:47 GMT
Viewed: 
458 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:

What is the right thing to do?  Is there a lot of room for slippage?  How
much does what is done matter?  Should I be offended?  If so, to what degree?

If it had been me that asked for info I probably would have sent you a
private thanks. Or maybe even a public one. The line between clutter and
politeness is indistinct in this area. I doubt very much that Chris slighted
you deliberately, that's not his way.

But should you be offended? Well that's your call of course. No one can
dictate whether one should be offended or not, that is always an internal
decision. While it is true that no one has the right NOT to be offended by
what someone else said, I'd advise against letting anything said (or not
said in this case) while online be considered as offensive.  Easy to say,
hard to do.

I found the links and info useful, so much so that if OT.debate had a FAQ
I'd nominate that post for it.



Message is in Reply To:
  Netiquette Question (was Re: Legal Education? etc. )
 
I am just curious about something... Christopher posed a request here, and I have gone to some lengths to fulfill that request in the previous post. Now it happens that I don't care if he responds to the previous post or not (REALLY!), but I wonder (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

13 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR