Debate : 16809


Off-Topic / Debate / 16809	16808 \| 16810

Subject:	Re: Netiquette Question (was Re: Legal Education? etc. )
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:24:46 GMT
Viewed:	544 times

Dave and Lar: Thanks for the replies. I am really interested in what people have to say about this issue, but at the same time I am really NOT offended that Christopher has done nothing at this point. It is merely that his having done nothing allows me to pose the question in a very particular way -- that's all. It'a all abstract -- I swear! The question is asked purely rhetorically. I have no emotional involvement in this scenario at all. If Christopher asked for more, I'd give him more without hesitation. -- Hop-Frog

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Netiquette Question (was Re: Legal Education? etc. )
(...) Whew! I'm sure I will. I place an unseemly value on "the really good notes" in this forum. Most of those have been written by you about the law and related politics, LFB about history and particularly it's effects on our current perceptions, (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Netiquette Question (was Re: Legal Education? etc. )
(...) Agree with Larry. Netiquette could swing both ways depending on who, when, and what forum. (...) Ok, my take is a very definite "no". My advice is: Don't be offended by anything. Or try not to be. It's a waste of emotion, and being a negative (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

13 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search