Subject:
|
Re: War on Drugs SUPPORTS terrorists.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Mar 2002 21:22:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
213 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> (hello, CIA, I'm talking about you in the not so distant past)
Why be so generous? I think they are STILL dealing drugs, as are many
members of most of our law enforcement agencies. My assertion is and
essentially HAS TO BE correct -- how else could drugs flood our streets and
prisons? Moreover, the only rational reason to keep drugs illegal is to
make money off the artificially inflated price of illicit substances.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: War on Drugs SUPPORTS terrorists.
|
| (...) Maybe, maybe not. Never ascribe to malice what stupidity (or empire building) can adequately explain. Law enforcement types and their lobbyists, prison guards and their lobbyists, prison operating companies and their lobbyists... they all (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: War on Drugs SUPPORTS terrorists.
|
| (...) I wouldn't have any knowledge of the CIA specifically, but I agree with the logic that the only way drugs could be so prevalent is with complicit law enforcement. My buddy Aaron got a degree in criminal justice because he started out wanting (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: War on Drugs SUPPORTS terrorists.
|
| (...) The LP mailing list received an update. I could post it if there's interest. The drug czar didn't take the bait, unfortunately, so it did generate some other coverage, but not quite the controversy that was hoped for. (If the DEA or whoever (...) (22 years ago, 2-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
