 | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Ed Jones
|
| | | (...) See my reply to Weeks. (...) were (...) Again read my reply to Weeks. (...) Construction workers are employed by construction companies. Those companies have winter layoffs. Those employees, having worked 6 months or more, are entitled to (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Saw it. (...) Please explain why this is a good thing and not the inmates running the asylum. Please justify how burning down the administration building is a good way to send the message that the school is not delivering appropriate classes, (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | (...) [snip] (...) As a former teacher, two of the biggest problems with today's schools are: 1. lack of funding - classrooms are overcrowded, teacher salaries over the last 30 years have actually decreased (differnce of 1960's salary times (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Oh, I don't know about lack of funding. The per pupil amount spent has gone up a lot even in constant dollars. NY is particularly pernicious, bumping up against 10K a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) That may be your reason or your idea of why people school tax levies down. I disagree. People vote down tax levies simply because they do no want to pay taxes. (...) Is it any easier to be involved in a private school for someone who works? (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Wow, that's really disgusting. I think maybe Denny's watched Roger and Me a few too many times. (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | <3784A057.A9F1E5A7@voyager.net> <FEK0ss.3A1@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Why, exactly? (...) Good question. And the answer is yes. Private schools, being market driven, have reason to (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) That's amazing. When I taught - there were parent/teacher conferences every month in the evening and twice a year on Saturdays. But weren't there also PTA meetings in the evening? Couldn't you have made your complaint known at those meetings? (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I guess you mean a duplex. Sure, why not? Especially given the current state of the law that makes it so freakin difficult to get rid of losers once you find out they're scummy and you don't want them or their loud, dirty, possibly dangerous (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Statistical studies only support, and can never _prove_ a particular hypothesis. At least if you're rational and believe (generally) that the scientific method is valid. Ed can't possibly prove that, he can only support it with evidence. (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | <3784B28D.82177A5A@voyager.net> <FEK6nL.DDI@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Bully for you. Some public schools are better, some are worse. Point is that parents have no recourse when (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | <3784B28D.82177A5A@voyager.net> <FEK6nL.DDI@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Missed these. (...) When I speak of the ability to discriminate, so am I. (...) I don't believe I said that. I said (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I agree that this is a problem, but your number 2 below really drives the nail through the board. (...) It's advancing. Here at the University of Missouri, there are (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | Reply-To: cjc@newsguy.com Message-Id: <slrn7oalrb.7jg.cjc@...S.UTK.EDU> X-Newsreader: slrn (0.9.4.3 UNIX) (...) Or people have grown so fed-up with every new property tax increase being touted as "necessary to turn education around" and yet year (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) It sounds as if you're saying that the morally 'best' course of action would be to stand off and not take the unemployment. I disagree strongly. I think that if you disagree with the system in the way that you (and I) seem to, you owe it to (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | Christopher L. Weeks wrote in message <3784F884.EBFE1372@c...ri.edu>... (...) why do (...) Chris, I know we are on the same side and all, but following your moral further, it is also right to break the laws, as you see fit, because it hurts the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I don't see how my logic lead to this conclusion. But, I agree that breaking some laws is required to maintain moral purity. Since the US government uses my tax dollars to kill people with whom I have no beef, I do feel kind of sleazy allowing (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
